Showing posts with label Basel III. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Basel III. Show all posts

Thursday, August 4, 2016

The New Lending Rules that Have Developers Worried



These are notes I took on an interview regarding Basel III regulations and its impact on lenders and borrowers of construction financing;




High Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) Loans – A designation primarily for construction loans provided by banks. Proposed Basel III regulations will require higher reserves for loans with a HVCRE designation. Another implication of the HVCRE is that internal returns generated by the project must be kept within the project. For instance, after completion of the asset but before stabilization of the asset, there will likely be a period of positive cash flow. This provision will have onerous tax consequences on REITs, which are required by their tax designation to distribute a substantial portion (approximately 90%) of their taxable income to shareholders. 

Additionally, Basel III regulations will a have dampening effect on IRRs which impacts how cash flow is distributed among investors, and may dissuade investors from taking on certain construction projects altogether.

A construction loan will avoid the HVCRE designation provided it meets the following criteria:


  1. 15% of the capital is contributed as unencumbered equity;
  2. Maximum of 65% LTV; and
  3. Keep capital contributed in the asset, including equity and NOI.

The new rules apply to loans new and old, however these regulations are still being negotiated.

Friday, September 19, 2014

New Risk Rules Add Hurdle for Project Loans

Impending changes in the risk-based capital rules for banks are starting to affect the terms and pricing of some high-leverage construction loans.

The U.S. version of the "Basel 3" guidelines, which take effect Jan. 1, sharply increases the amount of capital banks must hold in reserve against "acquisition, development or construction" loans unless the leverage is 80% or less and the borrower’s up-front capital contribution is at least 15% of the project’s value.

While most bank loans would fall well under the 80% leverage limit, the equity requirement is proving to be an obstacle for some deals — largely because the 15% threshold is based on the estimated value of a project "as completed," rather than the cost of construction.

As they start negotiating loans that may close after the first of the year, banks are informing borrowers that they’ll need to put up enough cash to meet the new requirement, or pay a higher interest rate to compensate for the cost of holding additional risk-based capital, according to industry pros.

Complicating the calculations are some gray areas in the new regulations, adopted last year by the

Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC to conform with the Basel 3 standards set by the Bank for International Settlements. The regulators haven’t spelled out just what "as completed" means, said George Green, associate vice president of commercial/multi-family policy at the Mortgage Bankers Association.

"Is that stabilized, is it non-stabilized?" Green said. "The value of an income-producing property is based on its leased income. Significantly different values are generated if a building is substantially leased versus minimally leased."

The higher the projected value of the completed property, the more cash the borrower would have to provide upfront to reach the 15% threshold. The rules also mandate that those funds remain committed to the project until the loan is retired or converted into permanent financing meaning the developer can’t draw out leftover cash as a project nears completion.
Construction loans that don’t meet the leverage and borrower-equity requirements must be treated as "higher volatility commercial real estate" under the Basel 3 rules. Loans in that category will be subject to a risk weighting of 150%, while most other commercial mortgages will be weighted at 100% and certain multi-family loans will qualify for a 50% weighting. Banks are generally required to hold capital against 8% of the balance of their loans, but the higher risk weighting will bump that up to 12%.

While many banks have already set new lending standards in response to the rules, others are still working out the details. "It seems more banks are just waking up to this new regulatory environment," said one originator.

Some banks are starting to put language into preliminary loan agreements stating that the proposed pricing can change if the estimate of the project’s "as completed" value comes back higher than expected and the borrower’s equity doesn’t reach 15% of that figure.

One broker said he was already seeing signs that some banks are cutting back on construction lending to avoid the new capital charges.

Another industry pro said he knew of a few cases where banks walked away from potential deals when their calculations showed the loans would fall into the higher-volatility category.