What Does the End of Quantitative Easing Mean for Real Estate Values?

This past week the U.S. Federal Reserve announced the end to its quantitative easing (QE) program of mortgage-backed securities and U.S. government bonds purchases, which it began in 2008 in an attempt to stimulate the economy by lowering long-term interest rates.

The announcement came as no surprise.

For over a year, the Fed has directly and indirectly signaled that this was coming, in effect pulling the Band-Aid off ever so gently. The immediate market reaction has been very measured, with the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield only up modestly in the last week--less than 10 basis points (bps) as of mid-day on October 30, 2014.

The end of QE is a big step in the recovery from the Great Recession. Although the medium-term effects are difficult to predict at this point, conventional wisdom points to rising interest rates in 2015. Our view is that there are several factors that mitigate the likelihood of a material rise in interest rates in the medium term.

The most notable factor is the recent weakening of the global economy, particularly in the European Union, where a form of QE was recently implemented and additional stimulus measures seem likely. The deterioration in growth in China, which is hurting emerging markets, and some developed economies like Germany is dampening global growth expectations as well. Other factors include the recent rise in the value of the U.S. dollar, which, along with falling oil prices, is helping to suppress domestic inflation.

Global real estate consultant CBRE feels that a material rise in rates remains some way off and the impact on commercial real estate of the recent announcement will be negligible.

To support this, CBRE looked back to the events of May-August 2013, when Chairman Bernanke made the first direct suggestion that the Fed would reduce its bond-buying program, which triggered the "taper tantrum" that caused 10-year U.S. Treasury yield to expand by over 100 bps in the course of four months.

CBRE studied the immediate effect on commercial real estate of the rise in the 10-year U.S. Treasury by looking at actual trades executed by CBRE Capital Markets professionals following the spike. The results showed very modest changes in values, with almost no effect in all asset types except multifamily, which, while small (generally less than 2%), was greater than all other asset types. Commercial real estate proved resilient to a rapid rise in long-term interest rates in mid-2013, and CBRE believes it will be the same over the next several years.

CBRE says there is certainly a strong long-term relationship between long-term interest rates and real estate cap rates. However, the lags are rather long and there are powerful medium-term offsets. For instance, high institutional demand for core commercial real estate against relatively limited supply and good U.S. GDP growth momentum have created positive market sentiment. Most of all, pent-up rent increases across the major asset classes--due to rolling leases entered into during the 2008-2010 time frame and new occupancy demand driven by a growing economy--should bolster cap rate stability, even in a rising interest rate environment.

Other mitigants include geopolitical turmoil, which makes U.S. Treasuries, the "risk free" security of choice, more attractive and keeps rates low, and the increased globalization of commercial real estate financing sources, where some foreign buyers are tapping into financing from their home countries, which have a much lower cost of debt than the U.S., to underwrite purchases.

Also, the good news of a tightening labor market cannot be ignored, particularly for many industries that directly or indirectly affect commercial real estate including trucking, oil and gas, and construction. However, inflation expectations remain low and stable, and short-term rates are likely to move up only very slowly.

Spencer Levy, head of CBRE Americas Research concluded with: "The end of QE speaks to the gathering strength of the U.S. economy and won't affect commercial real estate values."

No Taper

Summary:  FOMC will not taper their current quantitative easing measures.



New York --(Federal Reserve Press Release)--
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in September generally suggests that economic activity has continued to expand at a moderate pace. Indicators of labor market conditions have shown some further improvement, but the unemployment rate remains elevated. Available data suggest that household spending and business fixed investment advanced, while the recovery in the housing sector slowed somewhat in recent months. Fiscal policy is restraining economic growth. Apart from fluctuations due to changes in energy prices, inflation has been running below the Committee's longer-run objective, but longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic growth will pick up from its recent pace and the unemployment rate will gradually decline toward levels the Committee judges consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee sees the downside risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market as having diminished, on net, since last fall. The Committee recognizes that inflation persistently below its 2 percent objective could pose risks to economic performance, but it anticipates that inflation will move back toward its objective over the medium term.

Taking into account the extent of federal fiscal retrenchment over the past year, the Committee sees the improvement in economic activity and labor market conditions since it began its asset purchase program as consistent with growing underlying strength in the broader economy. However, the Committee decided to await more evidence that progress will be sustained before adjusting the pace of its purchases. Accordingly, the Committee decided to continue purchasing additional agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month and longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $45 billion per month. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. Taken together, these actions should maintain downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative, which in turn should promote a stronger economic recovery and help to ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with the Committee's dual mandate.

The Committee will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial developments in coming months and will continue its purchases of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate, until the outlook for the labor market has improved substantially in a context of price stability. In judging when to moderate the pace of asset purchases, the Committee will, at its coming meetings, assess whether incoming information continues to support the Committee's expectation of ongoing improvement in labor market conditions and inflation moving back toward its longer-run objective. Asset purchases are not on a preset course, and the Committee's decisions about their pace will remain contingent on the Committee's economic outlook as well as its assessment of the likely efficacy and costs of such purchases.

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the Committee decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee's 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. In determining how long to maintain a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy, the Committee will also consider other information, including additional measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Charles L. Evans; Jerome H. Powell; Eric S. Rosengren; Jeremy C. Stein; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Janet L. Yellen. Voting against the action was Esther L. George, who was concerned that the continued high level of monetary accommodation increased the risks of future economic and financial imbalances and, over time, could cause an increase in long-term inflation expectations.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20131030a.htm